The national ratings index from the U.S. Track & Field and Cross Country Coaches Association (USTFCCCA) gives a glimpse at the best teams every week leading up to the Division I outdoor championships. When the first rankings are revealed each year, it brings excitement and anticipation. But how likely is it that the first rankings are a true indicator of who will win that year's championship?
We took a look at the history of the women's rankings and here's what we found.
How the first USTFCCCA rankings predict the champion
For the sake of this article LSU's 2012 title is not recognized because its participation in the championships was vacated by the krikya18.committee on infractions
The history of the rankings
To understand the correlation between the USTFCCCA rankings and the national champion, one must first understand the history of the rankings.
The USTFCCCA began its outdoor track and field season rankings in 2008. The first rankings came during the preseason for outdoor track and field, a tradition that would continue through 2019.
Then the 2020 outdoor track and field season got canceled because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
After a year's absence, the rankings returned in 2021 and for the first time, the USTFCCCA began the season with Week 1 rankings rather than preseason rankings. In 2022, 2023 and 2024, Week 1 again kicked off the season's rankings.
UNBREAKABLE: The most unbreakable โ we think โ records in womenโs track and field
Behind the first No. 1
With each year's initial rankings comes a team ranked in the top spot. But how is the first No.1 picked?
From the rankings from 2008-19 โ back when the first rankings were still in the preseason โ it's concluded that the first No. 1 team in the country was determined based on the prior season's finish in the championships and returning talent.
Three times, including the latter two years of Texas A&M's three-peat from 2009-11, was the defending champion named preseason No. 1. Another three times, the preseason No. 1 was the previous year's runner-up. In fact, every preseason No. 1 finished within the top four of NCAA championship scoring in the year prior for the first 13 years of the ratings.
It wasn't until 2022's Week 1 ranking that Texas broke the mold, jumping from its seventh-place finish a year before. Then in 2023 and 2024, defending champions Florida and Texas were unranked in Week 1's poll which came just 16 days after indoor championships.
Year | First No. 1 | Prior Year Finish |
---|---|---|
2008 | LSU | Runner-up |
2009 | Texas A&M | Third |
2010 | Texas A&M | Champion |
2011 | Texas A&M | Champion |
2013 | Kansas | Fourth |
2014 | Texas A&M | Runner-up |
2015 | Texas A&M | Third |
2016 | LSU | Fourth |
2017 | Oregon | Runner-up |
2018 | Arkansas | Third |
2019 | Southern California | Champion |
2021 | LSU | N/A |
2022 | Texas | Seventh |
2023 | LSU | Fourth |
2024 | Seventh |
THE BOWERMAN: A complete history of track and field's highest individual honor
What does it all mean?
It means that the team selected to the No. 1 spot in the first rankings of the season more often than not has a proven track record of success. The first teams to land the top spot in the rankings deserve it, but that doesn't always mean they can go wire to wire.
Yet, with more and more teams waiting to start run their best runners in their outdoor openers until after Week 1 โ allowing more rest from the indoor season โ the preseason rankings begin to carry less weight.
Where were the champions ranked to start the season?
From 2008-2021, no team won the women's outdoor track and field championship after starting the season ranked outside of the top four. In 2022, Florida became the first non-top four team to win the title after starting the season at No. 5. In 2023, Texas became the first team from outside of the top-25 (No. 80) to win the title. In 2024, Arkansas became the first unranked team from the first rankings to win the title.
In seven out of the 15 eligible years through 2024, the year's women's outdoor champion started the season ranked first overall.
That means 47 percent of the time the first USTFCCCA rankings will let you know who the national champion will be, simply by looking at the No. 1 team. However, the No. 2 team in the first rankings has NEVER won the national championship. Only once has the No. 3 team to start the season, 2016 Arkansas, won the title, while the No. 4 team has won the title an impressive four times since the USTFCCCA rankings began.
Year | Champion | Initial Ranking |
---|---|---|
2008 | LSU | 1 |
2009 | Texas A&M | 1 |
2010 | Texas A&M | 1 |
2011 | Texas A&M | 1 |
2013 | Kansas | 1 |
2014 | Texas A&M | 1 |
2015 | Oregon | 4 |
2016 | Arkansas | 3 |
2017 | Oregon | 1 |
2018 | Southern California | 4 |
2019 | Arkansas | 4 |
2021 | Southern California | 4 |
2022 | Florida | 5 |
2023 | Texas | 80 |
2024 | Arkansas | NR |
๐: Here are the DI track and field teams with most NCAA championships
What happened to the No. 1s that didn't win the title?
Eight times the teams ranked No. 1 in the first ranking did not win the title. The No. 1 team has not won the title in any of the last six years and all eight have come in the last decade, with Oregon's 2017 season being the lone outlier. Listed below are the preseason/first No. 1's to not win the title and where they finished at the championships.
YEAR | First No. 1 | Championship finish |
---|---|---|
2015 | Texas A&M | Third |
2016 | LSU | Sixth |
2018 | Arkansas | Eleventh |
2019 | Southern California | Runner-up |
2021 | LSU | Sixth |
2022 | Texas | Runner-up |
2023 | LSU | Seventh |
2024 | Sixth |
VENUE HISTORY: These historic moments all happened at Hayward Field
What does history say for the future seasons?
The history of the first USTFCCCA rankings is good news for whatever team kicks off the season with the top spot in the Week 1 rankings. Said team will have a little less than a 50-50 shot at the title.
The ranking's history is not so good news for the No. 2 team in the season's first national ratings index. Meanwhile, the third and fourth and fourth ranked teams should have high hopes.
The views on this page do not necessarily reflect the views of the NCAA or its member institutions.