basketball-men-d1 flag

Andy Wittry | krikya18.com | March 31, 2020

Seton Hall looks to buck trend among experienced teams in NCAA Tournament

  Seton Hall ranks ninth nationally in minutes continuity but similarly experienced teams have struggled making it deep in the NCAA Tournament in recent years.

There was something special about Seton Hall's 2014 recruiting class. The six-man class of Khadeen Carrington, Ismael Sanogo, Desi Rodriguez, Angel Delgado, Michael Nzei and Isaiah Whitehead was highly regarded, built around a core of players who attended high school in greater New York City and New Jersey.

Whitehead left after his sophomore year for the NBA and the five student-athletes from that class who remain are on pace to usher in the best three-year stretch for the program in the last 25 years.

RELATED: Seton Hall's faith in Kevin Willard is paying off

Under former Seton Hall coach P.J. Carlesimo, the Pirates won 76 games between the 1990-91 and 1992-93 seasons, which included three NCAA Tournament appearances.

Ranked No. 21 in the latest AP poll, Seton Hall (13-2) is on pace to go to its third consecutive NCAA Tournament after qualifying for the Big Dance in just three seasons between the end of Carlesimo's tenure in 1994 and the start of the 2014 season.

In each season since 2014, the Pirates' minutes continuity – a stat calculated by the advanced college basketball metrics website – has improved. The metric is calculated by taking each player on a team's current roster, using the minimum percentage of the team's total minutes that he played when comparing last season and the current season, and adding the total percentages for each player.

Seton Hall ranks ninth nationally in minutes continuity (75.9 percent) this season, thanks to its senior core of Rodriguez, Delgado, Carrington and Sanogo, as well as the signifcant roles of sophomore Myles Powell (who has played in 74.2 percent of the team's minutes this season) and redshirt junior Michael Nzei (46.8%). Kenpom.com has found that teams with more continuity typically perform better than teams with less continuity, but the teams with the most continuity nationally haven't fared as well in the postseason in recent seasons as one might expect.

In the last five seasons, the top 10 teams each season in minutes continuity have averaged 21.68 wins and 12 losses, combining for 16 out of a possible 50 NCAA Tournament bids. Those 16 teams exited the tournament once in the First Four, 10 times in the first round and three times in the second round. Wisconsin made the Sweet 16 last year when the Badgers had the most continuity of any team in the country (86.6 percent) and Kansas made the Elite Eight in 2016 when the Jayhawks were No. 10 nationally in minutes continuity.

It's worth noting that many of the teams examined play in conferences outside the power structure, meaning there are typically fewer available bids to the NCAA Tournament for teams in their position. But the teams with the most returning experience from a minutes standpoint have only made it to the second weekend of the tournament twice in the last five years.

Seton Hall could add its name to that list this season. Other candidates are USC (No. 4 in minutes continuity) and Wichita State (No. 7).

The Pirates are in the midst of a 14-year winless drought in the NCAA Tournament, last claiming a tournament victory in 2004. They could have the balance and experience to make it past the first round in this year's NCAA Tournament.

Seton Hall has four players who average double figures in points – Rodriguez (18.6 ppg), Powell (14.7 ppg), Carrington (14.1 ppg) and Delgado (13.7 ppg). Delgado is also a double-double machine with 11 double-doubles in his first 15 games this season. As of Jan. 5, he ranks in the top five nationally in offensive rebounding percentage.

Here is a look at the top 10 teams in minutes continuity from each of the past five seasons, courtesy of kenpom.com.

Year School Minutes Continuity Rank Continuity Percentage Record NCAA Tournament Exit
2017 Wisconisn 1 86.6% 27-10 Sweet 16
2017 Saint Mary's 2 83.4% 29-5 Second round
2017 North Dakota 3 82.0% 22-10 First round
2017 Monmouth 4 81.5% 27-7 N/A
2017 UT Arlington 5 81.3% 27-9 N/A
2017 Georgia Southern 6 81.0% 18-15 N/A
2017 Belmont 7 78.2% 23-7 N/A
2017 Santa Clara 8 77.7% 17-16 N/A
2017 Dayton 9 77.3% 24-8 First round
2017 Holy Cross 10 77.2% 15-17 N/A
2016 Central Michigan 1 84.2% 17-16 N/A
2016 Valparaiso 2 82.6% 30-7 N/A
2016 Evansville 3 82.4% 25-9 N/A
2016 UAB 4 81.9% 26-7 N/A
2016 Furman 5 80.6% 19-16 N/A
2016 Cincinnati 6 80.4% 22-11 First round
2016 Tulsa 7 80.2% 20-12 First Four
2016 Louisiana Lafayette 8 78.5% 19-15 N/A
2016 James Madison 9 78.3% 21-11 N/A
2016 Kansas 10 76.9% 33-5 Elite Eight
2015 Wofford 1 87.7% 28-7 First round
2015 Sacramento State 2 86.3% 21-12 N/A
2015 Radford 3 86.1% 22-12 N/A
2015 St. Francis (PA) 4 85.4% 16-16 N/A
2015 Evansville 5 84.7% 24-12 N/A
2015 Lafayette 6 82.5% 20-13 First round
2015 Texas 7 79.7% 20-14 First round
2015 Toledo 8 78.7% 20-13 N/A
2015 Northern Arizona 9 78.3% 23-15 N/A
2015 Colorado 10 77.7% 16-18 N/A
2014 Boston University 1 87.6% 24-11 N/A
2014 Radford 2 85.8% 22-13 N/A
2014 North Dakota State 3 84.9% 26-7 Second round
2014 Elon 4 84.5% 18-14 N/A
2014 Indiana State 5 84.3% 23-11 N/A
2014 Iowa 6 82.9% 20-13 First round
2014 Boise State 7 82.8% 21-13 N/A
2014 Western Carolina 8 81.9% 19-15 N/A
2014 La Salle 9 80.9% 15-16 N/A
2014 Mississippi State 10 80.6% 14-19 N/A
2013 Ohio 1 91.8% 24-10 N/A
2013 Davidson 2 91.4% 26-8 First round
2013 Saint Joseph's 3 90.9% 18-14 N/A
2013 USC Upstate 4 89.5% 16-17 N/A
2013 Stetson 5 81.3% 15-16 N/A
2013 Bucknell 6 81.0% 28-6 First round
2013 South Dakota State 7 79.4% 25-10 First round
2013 Rutgers 8 78.1% 15-16 N/A
2013 San Diego 9 77.9% 16-18 N/A
2013 Creighton 10 77.7% 28-8 Second round

NIT, WBIT finalists 1 win away from finishing the season as champions

The Men's NIT championship takes place at 7 p.m. ET on Thursday, April 4 at Indianapolis' Hinkle Fieldhouse where Seton Hall and Indiana State will take center stage and get the chance to prove their meddle.
READ MORE